Direct answer and scope

The SHA-256 value answers a narrow question: do the examined bytes match the expected bytes for the named archived file? For the August 25, 2026 California snapshot, the Funeral_Data00.xls file has an expected SHA-256 value of 62f35460f34dd8748672f889839c03dde187891922d0837f08b615b4bcf3be50. A matching observed value identifies that archived file content for the snapshot used in the directory build.

The checksum does not answer whether every funeral-license record is still current, complete, or correct after the file's August 1, 2026 DCA update date. It is not a substitute for examining an official record when the question concerns a particular license type, number, or raw status.

The archived public layout includes fields such as license type, license number, individual-or-organization indicator, public-address fields including City and County, dates, and raw license status. Those fields can be reported within their documented scope. A public address of record is not thereby a service location or service area, and the listed fields do not establish quality, availability, ownership links, or manager relationships.

How to use the supplied evidence

Start with the file identity. Confirm that the filename is the intended source, that the snapshot date is August 25, 2026, and that the DCA file-update date is August 1, 2026. The Funeral_Data00.xls file contains 6,137 records and has the expected SHA-256 value stated for that snapshot. The companion Cemetery_Data00.xls file contains 6,688 records and has its own separate expected SHA-256 value.

Next, compare the observed SHA-256 value produced from the archived file with the expected value for that same filename. A match supports byte identity for that file and snapshot. It does not merge the two files, convert one record type into another, or extend the snapshot beyond the dates supplied.

Then preserve the source fields as raw evidence. DCA's layout describes raw status values including Current, Delinquent, and Inactive. If a directory build uses a status subset or a normalized label, it must retain the raw value and disclose the mapping, filter criteria, snapshot date, file-update date, and coverage. A raw value must not be silently converted into a broader conclusion.

The separate control total for the snapshot is 1,127 Funeral Director Establishment records across all license statuses. That number is a raw all-status control total for the specified snapshot and file date. It is not a count of a narrower status group or a conclusion about the records' other characteristics.

Decision framework

Use the checksum when the question is whether the archived file bytes correspond to the expected file for the dated directory build. The relevant inputs are the filename, snapshot date, DCA update date, expected checksum, and observed checksum. These items answer the file-integrity question without changing the meaning of the underlying records.

Use the archived record fields when the question is what the supplied snapshot contains. Report the exact license type, number, individual-or-organization indicator, public-address fields, dates, and raw status within the documented layout. If a result is filtered, identify the raw status values and the filter rather than presenting the all-status control total as a narrower count.

Use a separate official record check when the question concerns a record's present status or another matter that may have changed since the dated file. The snapshot is immutable and not a live DCA view. A checksum can identify the bytes that were used; it cannot update those bytes or establish a later record state.

Keep the questions separate: file identity asks whether the archived bytes match; record interpretation asks what the supplied fields say; a later official check asks what the applicable record shows at that later point. The evidence supplied here does not support a conclusion about currency or correctness beyond the stated snapshot and its documented fields.

Limits and what to verify next

If the observed hash does not match the expected hash for the named archived file, byte identity has not been confirmed for that comparison. The mismatch should remain an unresolved integrity result rather than being presented as a successful match. Check that the comparison uses the same filename and the intended archived file, and keep the expected and observed values associated with their dates.

For a record-specific inquiry, verify the exact license type and number against the applicable official information and note the verification date. Preserve the raw status value instead of replacing it with a broader label. A status value from the dated public-disclosure snapshot should be understood in relation to that snapshot, not as a real-time determination.

For location questions, distinguish the public address fields from a service location or service area. For service questions, availability questions, ownership questions, or manager-relationship questions, obtain separate evidence that directly addresses that subject. The DCA layout and snapshot do not establish those matters.

For any derived count, disclose the exact status filter, the raw values included, the snapshot date, the DCA file-update date, and the coverage. The 1,127-record figure must remain labeled as the all-status Funeral Director Establishment control total for the specified snapshot.

Questions people ask

A checksum is useful for identifying a particular archived file, but it is only one part of a dated evidence record. The filename, dates, raw fields, status treatment, and any separate record check must remain distinct.

Evidence behind this page

Each point below is restricted to what the cited primary source supports. Administrative listing status is not a quality endorsement.

Claim-level evidence used on this page
EvidenceSupported pointScope and limitation
Evidence 1Use the exact documented DCA public fields, including the raw City and County values within the archived public-address record, and identify the data as a monthly public-disclosure snapshot.The files are not real-time; public address of record is not proof of a service location or service area, and the fields do not establish quality, availability, ownership links, or manager relationships.
Evidence 2Disclose the exact snapshot date, DCA file update date, filenames, record totals, and checksums as provenance for normalized directory records.This is an immutable snapshot rather than a live DCA view; the checksums identify archived bytes but do not prove that every record remains current, complete, or correct after 2026-08-01.
Evidence 3Report 1,127 only as the raw all-status Funeral Director Establishment control total for the 2026-08-25 snapshot of the file updated 2026-08-01.This is not an active-establishment count, unique-business count, open-to-consumers count, service-availability count, or quality measure; any subset requires an exact disclosed status filter and coverage note.
Evidence 4Preserve the exact raw status and disclose any normalized mapping, filter criteria, snapshot date, file update date, and coverage before reporting a derived subset.Do not silently map a raw value to active, open, available, approved, safe, or recommended, and do not call the all-status control total an active count.
Evidence 5Describe fixed-term display inventory with clear sponsor labeling and no influence on inclusion, license fields, status labels, or default ordering.This editorial rule is not a statutory safe harbor; launch requires California legal review, written advertiser terms, disclosure QA, and rejection of compensation tied to funeral procurement or disposition recommendations.

Questions people ask

What does the SHA-256 value on this California funeral directory identify?

It identifies the exact bytes represented by the expected hash for the named archived file. If the observed hash matches, the examined file has the same byte content as that archived snapshot file. The value does not establish a later record state or add meaning to fields that the file does not contain.

Does a matching checksum prove every funeral-license record is current?

No. A matching checksum identifies the archived bytes used for the dated snapshot. The California files are monthly public-disclosure snapshots, not real-time data, and the checksum does not prove that every record remains current, complete, or correct after the August 1, 2026 DCA file-update date.

Can a checksum show that a DCA field is complete or correct?

No. It can confirm that the examined file bytes match the expected archived bytes. It does not independently establish that a field is complete or correct. Interpret the documented raw fields within the supplied snapshot and use a separate official record check for a record-specific question.

Why are the snapshot date and DCA file-update date still required?

They identify the time reference for the evidence. The specified snapshot was obtained on August 25, 2026 and used files updated by DCA on August 1, 2026. The dates distinguish the archived snapshot from a later official record and keep the checksum tied to the file it describes.

What happens when the downloaded file hash does not match the archived manifest?

Byte identity is not confirmed for that comparison. Keep the result unresolved and do not present the file as a confirmed match for the archived manifest. Check the filename and the intended archived file before relying on the comparison, and retain the expected and observed values with their dates.

Can file integrity prove operation, services, quality, availability, recommendation, or legal compliance?

No. File integrity identifies archived bytes only. The supplied DCA layout and snapshot do not establish services, availability, quality, ownership links, manager relationships, or a service location. A separate subject-specific authority or record would be needed for a question outside the file-integrity result.

Primary sources

  1. California Department of Consumer Affairs — Public Information Licensee Lists Overview and Record Layout Verified 2026-08-26
  2. California Department of Consumer Affairs — Public Information Dataset Box Folder Verified 2026-08-26
  3. California Legislative Information — Business and Professions Code Article 6, Disciplinary Proceedings Verified 2026-08-26
  4. Federal Trade Commission — Endorsement Guides Questions and Answers Verified 2026-08-26